Your Evidence Vault
Compliance Confidence
Starts Here
Starts Here
Every session you document is a protected asset. Every evidence package is an ownership record that belongs to you regardless of platform, subscription, or employment status.
0
Sessions
0
Complete
0
Platforms
Recent Evidence Records
No sessions documented yet.
Every AI session you have is an ownership record waiting to be created.
Every AI session you have is an ownership record waiting to be created.
AI
Auto-Populate from Session
Paste your AI conversation and Claude will analyze it and pre-fill every field for you to verify
You can export conversations from Claude.ai via Settings, from ChatGPT via Data Controls, or simply copy and paste from the chat window.
0 of 5 Elements
1
Session Metadata *
When, where, and under what context this work was created
Personal Device + Personal Account
Clearest ownership. Your device, your subscription.
Personal Device + Corporate Auth
Okta on personal phone. Device ownership documented.
Corporate Device + Personal Account
Personal subscription on work device. Intent documented.
Corporate Device + Corporate Account
Employer environment. Document as independent work only if clearly personal.
2
Creative Intent Statement *
What you were trying to accomplish and what expertise you brought
This is the human contribution the AI cannot replicate. Be direct and specific.
ZNS Solutions
Consulting practice work product
Where Did the Money Go
Journalism platform content
Personal Creative Work
Independent of employment
Employer Work Product
agilon health — corporate work
3
Prompt and Input Record *
The creative direction you gave the AI — the human steering of the work
Original source material you contributed strengthens the human authorship record significantly.
4
Output Capture and Editorial Record *
What the AI produced and what you changed — this gap is where your authorship lives
These decisions are the heart of your human authorship claim. Be as specific as possible.
5
Framework Mapping and Package Details
Which governance frameworks this work relates to and final record details
Select all frameworks this work touches. Each selection strengthens the compliance relevance of the evidence package.
Human Authorship Evidence Standard
HAES is the first governance doctrine built from the human outward. It fills the gap that every existing AI governance framework leaves open: the protection of the individual human creator, consultant, employee, and professional regardless of employment status, industry, or jurisdiction.
Every existing framework — NIST, ISO 42001, the IIA Standards, the EU AI Act — was designed to protect institutions. HAES was designed to protect the person inside them.
The Three-Prong Doctrine
01
Ownership
Establish and document that a human being made meaningful creative contributions to AI-assisted work. The proactive foundation every creator needs.
02
Defense
Protect yourself from downstream exposure. Document the human editorial judgment applied between AI output and published work.
03
Enforcement
Maintain the chain of custody on your original thinking so you have a credible basis to act when someone uses your work without permission.
The Five Elements of HAES
Each evidence package you generate contains all five elements required by the HAES documentation standard:
1
Creative Intent Statement
Your goal and the expertise you brought to the session.
2
Prompt and Input Record
The creative direction you gave the AI.
3
Output Capture
What the AI produced before your editorial judgment.
4
Edit and Decision Log
The meaningful changes you made and why.
5
Exportable Record Package
Portable PDF that belongs to you regardless of platform or subscription.
Published by ZNS Solutions
Steven Zapolski | Founder, ZNS Solutions | Indianapolis, Indiana
Twenty years of GRC and audit technology experience. CIA candidate. Practitioner-developed doctrine.
Twenty years of GRC and audit technology experience. CIA candidate. Practitioner-developed doctrine.
This tool reflects governance and compliance best practices. It is not legal advice. Organizations with specific copyright questions should consult qualified intellectual property counsel.